Disputes & Independent Experts

Independent expertise grounded in commodity markets and commercial reality.

We assist international law firms and their clients with complex commodity disputes. We also work directly with producers, buyers, traders and financiers to assess and resolve disputes before they develop into formal proceedings.

Our experience brings together physical commodity trading, mining operations, contract performance, pricing, risk management, logistics and financial structures.

How we are engaged

Two distinct roles, with the same practical understanding of commodity markets.

01

Independent expert witnesses for law firms and their clients

We provide independent technical and commercial opinions in commodity disputes, mediations, arbitrations and tribunal proceedings.

Our work can include early case assessment, review of contracts and transaction records, analysis of market and operating evidence, formal written expert reports, review of opposing expert evidence, reply reports, expert conferences, preparation of joint statements identifying matters agreed and disputed, testimony and cross-examination.

We work closely with instructing legal teams on scope, evidence, assumptions, document requests and procedure. Our analysis and opinions remain independent, and our responsibility as expert witnesses is to assist the tribunal objectively and impartially on matters within our expertise.

We are accustomed to working with confidential and privileged material and to coordinating document requests, assumptions and communications through the instructing legal team.

02

Direct advice before formal proceedings

We advise commodity companies directly when a disagreement is developing, a counterparty has failed to perform or an existing arrangement needs to be restructured.

We can help establish what happened commercially, where the material exposures sit and whether a negotiated solution is preferable to arbitration or litigation.

Where appropriate, we assist with counterparty negotiations, contract restructuring and pre-litigation resolution. We do not provide legal advice. Where legal advice is required, we work alongside the client's existing legal advisers or, if asked, can help identify appropriately qualified counsel.

Commercial questions

What was the alleged failure actually worth in the real market?

Many disputes turn not only on whether an agreement was performed, but on the commercial and financial consequences of what occurred. We help law firms, tribunals and clients test those consequences against the way physical commodity markets actually work.

Quality and specification

Whether a cargo met the agreed specification; how any deviation affected usability or value; and whether it could reasonably have been accepted, treated, blended, redirected or sold at an appropriate discount.

Quantity and short delivery

The commercial effect of a short, excess or partial delivery, including contractual tolerances, replacement volumes, operational requirements and the impact on other purchase or sales commitments.

Failure to ship or take delivery

The consequences of non-performance affecting one cargo or a programme of shipments, and whether the surrounding conduct is consistent with genuine operational constraints, market conditions or a decision not to perform.

Delay and rescheduling

The effect of moving a shipment from one pricing or delivery period to another, including changes in market price, time spreads, freight, inventory, production schedules, working capital and downstream commitments.

Market prices and available markets

The prevailing price at the relevant time and place, and whether there was a genuine available market in which a cargo of the required specification, volume and delivery terms could actually have been bought or sold.

Replacement cargoes

Whether a replacement transaction was commercially reasonable, when it could realistically have been executed, and how differences in quality, origin, volume, location, freight, credit and timing affected the replacement price.

Pricing mechanisms

Which index or benchmark is commercially appropriate for the product, destination and transaction, and the operation of quotational periods, provisional and final pricing, premiums, discounts and price adjustments.

Logistics and associated costs

Freight, laytime, demurrage, storage, handling, blending, rerouting and other costs that may arise when cargoes are rejected, delayed, replaced or delivered somewhere other than originally intended.

Hedging and market exposure

How physical exposure relates to the available hedging instruments, including hedge replacement or unwind, basis risk, timing differences and changes in the forward curve.

Mitigation and commercial alternatives

What a producer, buyer or trader could reasonably have done after the event, the alternatives genuinely available at the time and whether later decisions increased or reduced the commercial loss.

Quantification under alternative assumptions

Where requested, we translate our market and commercial opinions into transparent calculations of the resulting financial consequences. These may reflect alternative factual or contractual assumptions supplied by the instructing lawyers. We can also review and test calculations advanced by another expert or party, without expressing an opinion on which legal case should prevail.

Market value

A market price is rarely just a number taken from an index.

An opinion on market value begins with the actual commodity and transaction. The relevant questions may include the grade and specification, volume, origin, delivery location, Incoterm, shipment window, payment terms and the identity and credit quality of potential counterparties.

Published indices and price-reporting data can be important evidence, but they may not represent the product, place, volume or timing at issue. Reported trades, bids, offers, forward curves and comparable transactions may need to be assessed alongside the index.

Where a party relies on a replacement cargo, we examine what was purchased or sold, when the decision was made, what alternatives were then available and why the replacement price differed from the original contract.

In a thin or illiquid market, the answer may require transparent adjustments to the closest reliable market evidence. If there was no genuine available market for the cargo at the relevant time, that limitation should be stated rather than hidden behind false precision.

Selected experience

Representative dispute engagements led by the Spearpoint partners.

Client names, counterparties and commercially sensitive details have been anonymised.

International Arbitration

Independent Technical Expert

Acting as an independent expert for international law firms across multiple commodity disputes, providing pre-submission technical and commercial analysis, initial and reply reports, expert conferences and joint statements, testimony and cross-examination in arbitration proceedings.

State-Owned Enterprise · China

Dispute Resolution

Working with a large Chinese state-owned enterprise to manage its significant exposure to an overseas investment implicated in a series of commercial disputes relating to the supply of raw materials to overseas customers.

Coal · Asia-Pacific

Pre-Litigation Restructuring

Acting for a coal buyer whose supplier defaulted on a fixed-price contract after a sharp adverse market move. The matter was de-escalated before formal proceedings, and a restructured agreement acceptable to both parties was negotiated.

Why Spearpoint

Senior practitioners who understand both the contract and the physical transaction.

Operator experience

Tim Gazzard and Louis Fel each have more than 25 years' experience across commodity markets, transactions and senior management roles. Tim's background includes mining, physical trading and investment banking. He also managed commercial disputes from inside a major commodity trading company, working with legal teams and independent experts in matters where the company acted as claimant or respondent. Louis's background combines physical commodity marketing, commercial law and experience spanning Chinese and Western commercial environments. That cross-market experience is particularly valuable in disputes involving parties whose communications, commercial expectations and ways of doing business differ.

Independent, senior delivery

There are no junior consultants. The partners who assess and scope the engagement undertake the work. Before accepting an appointment, we consider actual and potential conflicts and disclose any issue before commencing.

Read the partners' full biographies
Contact

Discuss an engagement.

If you are assessing a commodity dispute, appointing an independent expert or seeking to resolve a commercial disagreement before formal proceedings, contact either Spearpoint partner directly. We respond personally within 24 hours.

Spearpoint Commodities Pte Ltd · Singapore ·